Another potential benefit would be mixing kicks, e.g. I doubt you would ever need to zoom this far to fix a problem with the sample (clicking & vinyl distortion) without hearing it first. Also if you know a sample may require cleaning, most of the time youll be able to hear or see it in the waveform with 96 ppq and a small amount of zoom. Comparing waveforms like this will only tell you that information i said above. You are attempting to compare two separate samples, what is doing this going to tell you about its usage in a track? The context of a sample and its usage is best heard when applied in a whole song. You even do not need to change your working PPQ setting.įrom an analytical perspective, this holds some value, but what do you attempt to see of actual editing value or usage? I means as well as listening to it for audible problems, you can see from zooming at 96 ppq just a small amount if the initial wave value is zero crossing for example, as well as see the db reading. If any error has been occurred during manipulation, you can do that again without destructing the original sample.
After doing any modification to the sample like slicing up or removing the unwanted regions, you can revert back the zoom scale to the normal by resetting the "Time stretch" knob inside the sample window in the sequencer.
You should do that until straight lines like the ones shown in the below photo appear. The simple way of doing that is dragging the sample to the playlist and temporarily stretching the sample for example to the right. So what is the solution to do that inside the Playlist window? This method is destructive and after saving the sample and closing the Edison, there would not be any undo. So most people for doing that refer to Edison eg.
This method is good but it does not allow like Edison to zoom in to the sample level.
for manipulating the waveforms is always limited and one trick for overcoming it is changing 96 PPQ to 960 PPQ. As you know, traditional zoom scale in the playlist eg.
0 kommentar(er)
